Rumor has it that the BMW i7 and i5 facelifts will add NACS ports for US models

BMW’s slow but inevitable transition to the North American Charging Standard (NACS) is gathering pace in the United States. We’ve already learned that the 2026 BMW i5 M60 will be BMW’s first US model to ship with a native NACS port. However, some sources indicate that the Life Cycle Impulse versions of the BMW i7 and BMW i5 will also follow suit when they arrive in America. For owners, this isn’t just a cosmetic hardware change. It fundamentally changes where cars can be charged and how usable they become on long journeys.

The short version is very simple: NACS means access to Tesla’s Supercharger network. And for anyone who has spent time switching between third-party CCS fast chargers in the US, the benefits are clear. BMW tacitly acknowledged this when it introduced Supercharger integration via adapters earlier this month, giving existing BMW electric vehicles access to more than 25,000 Superchargers at 2,000 stations. This system will be retained for older vehicles, but the new connector removes a layer of complexity and brings BMW fully into the North American charging mainstream.

2027 BMW 5 Series Facelift Spy Photos 072027 BMW 5 Series Facelift Spy Photos 07

Rumor has it that the redesigned i7 and i5 models will follow the same scheme as the i5 M60: a physical NACS inlet replacing the traditional CCS combo socket. Therefore, we also expect the same software integration in the My BMW app and the vehicle’s native charging interface. This means: connect, drive off and leave the authentication and billing to the car via Plug & Charge.

There is also a broader product strategy here. BMW has already confirmed that all New Class models for North America, including the upcoming iX3, will be NACS native. Designed with an all-electric architecture, these vehicles appear destined to live entirely in a NACS-first ecosystem. By giving the updated i5 and i7 the same port, BMW avoids the awkward two-standard floating zone for new cars.

NACS vs CCS

CCS charging portCCS charging port

The technical differences between NACS and CCS help explain why the industry is turning to the connector developed by Tesla. NACS is physically smaller, lighter and easier to handle, especially in cold weather when CCS connectors can feel like frozen garden hoses. It also integrates AC and DC charging in a single compact form factor instead of the oversized two-section CCS input. Despite its smaller size, NACS supports the high performance levels expected by modern electric vehicles. Tesla’s own V3 and future V4 Superchargers routinely deliver charging speeds that comfortably fit within the window that most BMW electric vehicles can accept, and the communications protocol is fully compatible with ISO 15118 functionalities such as Plug & Charge.

CCS still has theoretical advantages on paper. Some CCS stations offer peak power levels above 300kW, and CCS’s open standard means multiple charging networks can innovate independently. But the reality on American roads is less glamorous. Tesla’s network remains denser, more reliable and more predictable, especially for cross-country travel. Access sells cars. BMW is aware of this and the LCI updates simply adapt the hardware to real-world usage patterns.